close

Look at the kind of authority you wield in terms of dominance: SC to Google

Singhvi further argued that in Korea, there is a different user and pressed that Google is there due to excellence and not due to dominance

IANS New Delhi
Google

The Supreme Court on Thursday orally told Google's counsel to look at the kind of authority it wields in terms of dominance, while hearing the tech giant's plea on seeking a stay on a Competition Commission of India (CCI) order imposing a Rs 1,337 crore penalty on it.

A bench headed by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud told senior advocate A.M. Singhvi, representing Google, said: "Dr Singhvi, all that you gave us in terms of data in fact militates against your argument."

"Look at the kind of authority which you wield in terms of dominance data indicates 15,000 Android models, 500 million compatible devices 1500 OEMs. When you have that kind of market penetration, then by insisting you necessarily have my bouquet you directly affecting... What the OEM does, impact upon the ultimate consumer," the Chief Justice said.

Singhvi submitted: "I am one of the players in this ecosystem, and people choose Google Play Store due to its excellence and not because of dominance."

He queried that had there been no Android, "would this revolution in telephony had taken place?"

Singhvi further argued that in Korea, there is a different user and pressed that Google is there due to excellence and not due to dominance.

Also Read

Google may face a third CCI fine in less than a month. Now for Android TV

Indian developers benefit from Android, Play: Google on CCI penalty

Google dials NCLAT against CCI's Android order, Rs 1,337-crore fine

Why does Google find itself in CCI's crosshairs?

Indian app developers hail CCI penalty on Google as 'collective victory'

Amazon shuts its charity donation program 'AmazonSmile' as it fails purpose

Havells India Q3 net dips 7.3% to Rs 283.52 cr on higher raw material costs

Sebi probes investments between Nippon Mutual Fund, YES Bank: Report

Vikram Kirloskar's daughter Manasi takes over as Toyota Kirloskar Motor VC

Jaguar Land Rover President and MD Rohit Suri to hang boots after 14 yrs

"Where it is voluntary, non-imposed. It is free, non exclusive, what more you can do?".

The bench, also comprising Justices P.S. Narasimha and J.B. Pardiwala, will continue to hear arguments in the matter in the afternoon.

On January 11, the Supreme Court had agreed to examine an appeal by Google against a decision by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), declining to stay a Rs 1,337.76 crore penalty imposed on it by the CCI for alleged anti-competitive practices.

Google moved the apex court after the setback at NCLAT, which did not stay the CCI order on abuse of dominant position in multiple markets in the Android mobile device ecosystem case.

Earlier this month, the NCLAT did not find any urgency to pass an interim order, after noting that Google filed the appeal in December last year, though the CCI passed the order in October.

It directed Google to deposit 10 per cent of the fine amount.

The tribunal had said that there was no urgency shown in the filing of the appeal, therefore Google could not be allowed to press for interim relief.

In October last year, the CCI had imposed a penalty of Rs 1,337.76 crore on the company for abusing its dominant position in multiple markets in relation to Android mobile devices.

The CCI also imposed a penalty of Rs 936.44 crore on the company for abusing its dominant position with respect to its Play Store policies.

--IANS

ss/ksk/

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Jan 19 2023 | 4:13 PM IST

Explore News