Broadcasters-cable operators face-off: Kerala HC to continue hearing on Tue

Justice Shaji P Chaly in whose court the matter is being heard has posted the issue for Tuesday

Viveat Susan Pinto Mumbai
Kerala High Court, Kerala HC

Kerala High Court | Photo: Wikipedia

The blackout in nearly 45 million homes across the country will persist for at least one more day as the Kerala High Court on Monday offered no relief to the All India Digital Cable Federation (AIDCF) in its plea asking for signals to be restored by a few broadcasters.
Justice Shaji P Chaly in whose court the matter is being heard has posted the issue for Tuesday, as the two sides have yet to conclude their arguments. The AIDCF is being represented by Senior Lawyer Abhishek Manu Singhvi, while the Indian Broadcasting and Digital Foundation (IBDF) is being represented by Former Attorney General of India, Mukul Rohtagi. The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), which has been made a party to the matter, has appointed Senior Advocate Rakesh Dwivedi to represent it in court.  

Television channels from the Star, Sony and Zee networks have been off air since Saturday after disconnection notices were sent last week by the above broadcasters to members of the AIDCF including top cable companies such as Hathway, Den, GTPL, NXTDigital and Asianet Digital Network.
The blackout came in the wake of a clash between cable operators and broadcasters over channel pricing following implementation of the new tariff order (NTO) 3.0 from February 1. While broadcasters say that the hike in channel prices is to the extent of 5-15 per cent only, cable operators say that the price hike could go up to 60 per cent, depending on the channel and network, which could hurt the domestic cable & satellite market, considered price-sensitive.

It may be recalled that the TRAI, which is the regulator for both the telecom and broadcast sectors, had amended the NTO 2.0 (now called NTO 3.0) in November 2022, restoring the price cap for a television channel, which is part of a bouquet, to Rs 19 from Rs 12 earlier.
AIDCF has contended in court that the TRAI had failed to regulate the pricing of television channels or cap their prices. Instead, it had increased the pricing of television channels that could be included in a bouquet against consumer interest.

Also Read

Delhi High Court stays TDSAT order asking broadcasters for OTT content

Gameskraft Technology faces Rs 21,000-crore tax notice for 'GST evasion'

Blackout: Why has the broadcaster-cable operator fracas come to a head?

Trai restores cap on MRP of a TV channel as part of a bouquet to Rs 19

TV broadcasters not buying big movies amid a drop in viewership: Report

Ex-commerce secretary Subrahmanyam to take over as Niti Aayog CEO

Big blow to Rapido, Ola and Uber as Delhi govt bars bike services

ED's raids in Chhattisgarh part of its probe in corruption case: BJP

Centre appoints B Subrahmanyam as NITI Aayog CEO; lyer moves to World Bank

Many of the world's billionaires share a zodiac sign, study finds

First Published: Feb 20 2023 | 9:10 PM IST

Explore News