The petitioners seeking legal validation of same-sex marriage on Wednesday urged the Supreme Court to use its plenary power, prestige and moral authority to push the society to acknowledge such a union which would ensure LGBTQIA persons lead a dignified life like heterosexuals.
A five-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud was told by senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for one of the petitioners, that the State should come forward and provide recognition to same-sex marriage.
He referred to the law on widow re-marriage, and said the society did accept it then and the law acted with alacrity and the social acceptance followed.
Here, this court needs to push the society to acknowledge the same-sex marriage. This court, besides the power under Article 142 (which provides SC the plenary power to pass any order necessary for doing complete justice) of the Constitution, has moral authority and it enjoys public confidence. We rely on the prestige and moral authority of this court to ensure that we get our right, Rohagti told the bench which also comprised Justices S K Kaul, S R Bhat, Hima Kohli and P S Narasimha.
He said, the State should come forward and provide recognition to same-sex marriage... which will help us leading a dignified life like heterosexuals.
At the outset of second day's proceedings, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, filed a fresh plea urging the top court that all the states and UTs be also made parties to the proceedings on the pleas.
Hear objection on pleas seeking validation of same-sex marriages: Centre
Hearing on same-sex marriage: Notion of man, woman is not absolute, says SC
SC agrees to hear Centre's plea on legal validation of same-sex marriage
SC begins hearing of pleas to recognise same-sex marriages; details here
Same-sex marriage in India: What did Supreme Court say in the case?
Iron ore miner NMDC exploring lithium reserves in Australia's Perth
Massive fire in West Bengal's Howrah district guts over 100 shops
State to function from Visakhapatnam starting September: Andhra Pradesh CM
Air pollution, heat, ambient noise linked to lower sleep quality: Study
Women can now work at night in Delhi factories; Kejriwal govt changes rules
In a fresh affidavit filed in the apex court, the Centre said it has issued a letter on April 18 to all the states inviting comments and views on the "seminal issue" raised in the pleas.
It is, therefore, humbly requested that all states and Union Territories be made a party to the present proceedings and their respective stance be taken on record and in the alternative, allow the Union of India, to finish the consultative process with the states, obtains their views/apprehensions, compile the same and place it on record before this court, and only thereafter adjudicate on the present issue," the affidavit said.
"It is submitted that the Union of India, has issued a letter dated April 18, 2023 to all states inviting comments and views on the seminal issue raised in the present batch of petition," it said.
Opposing the fresh plea of the government, Rohatgi said the pleas challenged the Central law, the Special Marriage Act, and just because the subject is there in the concurrent list of the Constitution, states and UTs need not be issued the notices.
You do not have to labour on this point, the CJI said.
Coming back to the submissions, Rohatgi referred to the judgements, including the decriminalisation of consensual gay sex, and said The court was revisiting something which has already been decided.
I am equal to heterosexual groups and it cannot be so that their sexual orientation is correct and all others are incorrect. I am saying let there be a positive affirmation...We should not be treated as lesser mortals and there will be full enjoyment of the right to life, he said.
The hearing is continuing.
The top court on Tuesday made it clear that it will not go into personal laws governing marriages while deciding the pleas seeking legal validation for same-sex marriages and said the very notion of a man and a woman, as referred to in the Special Marriage Act, is not "an absolute based on genitals".
The outcome will have significant ramifications for the country where common people and political parties hold divergent views on the subject.
The apex court had on November 25 last year sought the Centre's response to separate pleas moved by two gay couples seeking enforcement of their right to marry and a direction to the authorities concerned to register their marriages under the Special Marriage Act.
LGBTQIA stands for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, questioning, intersex and asexual.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)