China's Covid ambitions, to hide crucial data and avoid blame, could not have been accomplished without Western academics eagerly playing the useful idiot for Beijing, The New York Post has claimed in a report.
The report stated "Chinese scientists have withheld data, withdrawn genetic sequences from public databases and altered crucial details in journal submissions" while "Western journal editors enabled those efforts", and the World Health Organization just let all of it happen.
The New York Post wrote that two China-pushed narratives are at stake: that the virus did not escape from the Wuhan Institute of Virology and that China's murderous, totalitarian response to the pandemic was a model of success.
The degree of complicity in pushing these among leading institutions outside China astounds.
The guilty include major universities like Oxford and cutting-edge scientific journals, to say nothing of mega-powerful global nonprofits.
The journal Clinical Infectious Diseases seemingly falsely amended a paper on possible paths for Covid mutation to suggest that the data it was based on were collected later than they actually were.
Infectious diseases a near-term concern in quake-hit Turkey, Syria: ECDC
US Energy Dept concludes lab leak caused Covid-19 pandemic: Report
Centre releases Rs 22.20 cr for treatment of patients with rare diseases
Biden signs bill to declassify information related to origins of Covid
More people adopting preventive healthcare post-Covid, say experts
Twitter relaxes cannabis ad rules to lure in more advertisers from US
Fox News to hand over documents for second voting machine lawsuit
Standard Charted posts surprise 21% rise in profit on high interest rates
Nomura Holdings' profit sinks 76% as banking turmoil hits trading
Apple's AI coach Quartz will track mood to keep you fit & motivated
The Lancet, arguably the most important academic journal, pulled a group letter from Chinese hospital workers begging for international aid.
And WHO, the chief global health watchdog, played the role of a megaphone for China's claims about the virus' origin too many times to count, The New York Post wrote.
Journals don't want to lose access to the lucrative Chinese market by offending the government; many universities rely on monies coming via various paths from China; Beijing plays hardball bureaucratic politics to dominate outfits like WHO.
And elite institutions, especially in the academy, have been utterly captured by the left and have long sought some alternative to the evil, capitalistic hegemony of the United States and found it in Beijing's allegedly benevolent dictatorship.
"It's beyond time for our elite to face facts and stop bending the knee to Beijing by pretending it's a state like any other," read the report in the New York Post.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)