Silicon Valley Bank failed due to a combination of extremely poor bank management, weakened regulations and lax government supervision, the Federal Reserve said on Friday, in a highly-anticipated review of how the central bank failed to properly supervise the bank before it collapsed early last month.
The report, authored by Federal Reserve staff and Michael Barr, the Fed's vice chair for supervision, takes a critical look at what the Fed missed as Silicon Valley Bank grew quickly in size in the years leading up to its collapse.
The report also points out underlying cultural issues at the Fed, where supervisors were unwilling to be hard on bank management when they saw growing problems.
The Federal Reserve did not appreciate the seriousness of critical deficiencies in the firm's governance, liquidity, and interest rate risk management. These judgments meant that Silicon Valley Bank remained well-rated, even as conditions deteriorated and significant risk to the firm's safety and soundness emerged, the report said.
Silicon Valley Bank was the go-to bank for venture capital firms and technology start-ups for years, but failed spectacularly in March, setting off a crisis of confidence for the banking industry.
Federal regulators seized Silicon Valley Bank on March 10 after customers withdrew tens of billions of dollars in deposits in a matter of hours.
Asia witnesses limited contagion risk from Silicon Valley Bank's woes
Bank stocks can slide more; stay away for now: Analysts
No SVB-like scenario in India; banks are on a strong footing, say analysts
Fed hikes rate again by 75 basis points, hints at entering end phase
SaaS firm Freshworks says exposure to Silicon Valley Bank minimal
US provoking countries into military confrontation with Russia: Minister
Amazon falls after warning of slowdown in cloud computing business growth
Sudan conflict threatens supply of key ingredient for Coca-Cola, Pepsi
US labour costs pick up, likely locking in one more Fed rate hike
Foreign executives in China ask 'Who's Next?' After Bain & Company probe
Two days later, they seized Signature Bank of New York. Although regulators guaranteed all the banks' deposits, customers at other midsize regional banks rushed to pull out their money often with a few taps on a mobile device and move it to the perceived safety of big money center banks such as JPMorgan Chase.
The report also looks at the role social media and technology played in the bank's last days.
While the bank's management was poor and ultimately that was the reason the bank failed, the report also notes that social media caused a bank run that happened in just hours, compared to days for earlier bank runs like those seen in 2008.
Although the withdrawals have abated at many banks, First Republic Bank in San Francisco appears to be in peril, even after receiving a USD 30 billion infusion of deposits from 11 major banks in March. The bank's shares have plunged 57 per cent this week after it revealed the extent to which customers pulled their deposits in the days after Silicon Valley Bank failed.
The nation's banks are regulated by a troika of regulators: the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. All have been criticised for potentially missing signs that Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank might be in trouble.
Barr appeared at two hearings in Congress last month and acknowledged that Federal Reserve bank supervisors had warned Silicon Valley management as early as the fall of 2021 of risks stemming from its business model, but the bank's managers failed to take the steps necessary to fix the problems.
Republicans at both hearings had criticised federal regulators for failing to act with the proper sense of urgency.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)