US Supreme Court tosses case against legal shield to internet firms

A lower court allowed the suit to proceed under a law against aiding and abetting terrorism

US Supreme Court Photo: Bloomberg

US Supreme Court | Photo: Bloomberg

Listen to This Article

The US Supreme Court on Thursday sidestepped a challenge to federal protections for internet and social media companies that free them of liability for content posted by users. The case involved a lawsuit against Google involving the practices of video-sharing platform YouTube. 
The justices’ decision returns to a lower court the case of a family of an American college student who was killed in an Islamic State terrorist attack in Paris.

The family wants to sue Google for YouTube videos they said helped attract IS recruits and radicalise them. Google owns YouTube. Google claims immunity from the lawsuit under a 1996 law that generally shields social media company for content posted by others. Lower courts agreed with Google.
The justices had agreed to consider whether the legal shield is too broad. But in arguments in February, several sounded reluctant to weigh in now. In an unsigned opinion on Thursday, the court wrote that it was declining to address the law at issue.

The outcome is, at least for now, a victory for the tech industry, which predicted havoc on the internet if Google lost. But the high court remains free to take up the issue in a later case.
The court also ruled in a separate lawsuit involving Google, Twitter and Facebook, heard on the same day in February, that seeks to hold them liable for a terrorist attack in a Turkish nightclub that killed 39 people.

Also Read

Counter-terrorism, multilateralism India's key focus during UNSC presidency

Sri Lanka delays presenting new Anti-Terror Bill amid fresh opposition

Protests in Sri Lanka's northern, eastern provinces over anti-terror bill

Two HC judges elevated to SC, total strength of apex court reaches 34

OneWeb satellites soon to offer space-based internet services globally

French Open 2023: First time since 2004, Nadal won't play at Roland Garros

Why Fed rate-hike pause may not be good for stocks as Wall Street hopes?

US unemployment claims tumbled last week after fraud-inflated jump

Biden's re-election campaign sees 'viable pathways' to 2024 election win

Australia, India helping to search for crew of sunken Chinese vessel: China

A lower court allowed the suit to proceed under a law against aiding and abetting terrorism. The justices’ unanimously ruled that case could not go forward.

First Published: May 18 2023 | 10:28 PM IST

Explore News